- The Mechanical Turk
- A place to enjoy and learn about chess
- Openings, High Level and Club | The Week in Chess
- Search form;
- Welcome to Reddit,.
- Tactics, Chess Openings & End Games.
- Want to add to the discussion??
- The End of Openings, Part 2 | The Week in Chess;
- Full Chess Playing Computers.
I do not know how effective the other moves are, however I personally feel, its comparatively effective. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. Dag Oskar Madsen 7, 1 1 gold badge 23 23 silver badges 49 49 bronze badges. Stash Stash 41 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 2 2 bronze badges. Both have the same disadvantage: With precise and restrained play, White gains small but permanent advantage. This means that in the end you will be left without counterplay and will have to defend for a long time. Still, it is very hard to maintain this type of advantage so games always end in a draw.enter
If I were you, I would open calmly and strike aggressively in middlegame. French or Sicilian defense might suit you better sound and offers sharp play, but not so aggressive in the beginning. How Scandinavian is agressive?! Come on! It's "I will pray for draw" kind of openning The Scandinavian is aggressive as is one of the e4 defens that features faster development of all and active and castling for black.
Unfortunately, also for white. Ocal Sep 22 '14 at It also immediately strikes at White pawn , I don't know if there is anything more aggressive than that. It is tough to crack, but as I have stated, only White can play for a win. Black is usually solid and has counterplay but must "wait" for White to "waste all the ammo", if you get what I mean I must disagree.
The problem is, what kind of aggression was that, when at the end of opening you end up, as you said, "waiting for White to waste all the ammo". Okay, your 2nd move was agressive, now you "wait". I played a lot of Scandinavian in my life. Both Qa5 and Qd6. Against stronger oponents it's really unlikely to win. The most famous asymmetric way of playing against 1. Nf3 d6 3. Otherwise, forget about attacking for now, and try to get an equal position. RemcoGerlich RemcoGerlich This is certainly the right way to play although I don't fully agree with "you can't be aggressive", since the Najdorf is extreme aggression on both sides of the board , but this involves loads of theory that the OP wishes to avoid.
The Mechanical Turk
Ocal Sep 23 '14 at I don't see the extreme aggression from black's side in the Najdorf, until the moment where white's attack has been slowed down. And a good, aggressive, non-theoretical defence against 1. Well, the variations with an early b5 - b4 - a5 - Qc7 - Rfc8 - a4 do seem kind of intimidating from white's point fo view.
I do agree on theory knowledge being necessary for a good defense. Only if white castles long. You rely on several moves by white 3. You only have that attack because white believes he has an even better one. I only entered a FEN copied from Scid, apparently whatever the site uses displays them this way because it's black to move. Pijotrek Pijotrek 6 6 silver badges 9 9 bronze badges. I learnt the scotch gambit from the book 'Chess Openings for White Explained'. I also have the book for black openings. In that book it recommend to play the hyper accelerated dragon since it shortcuts a lot of theory and is sharp.
Would you recommend a person of my skill to learn it? I would surely pick it over standard Dragon, Najdorf and Scandinavian, but still my top would be Taimanov. But well, try that accelerated dragon, a lot of people plays it like it was standard one and ends up with crucial tempo less. And it's always nice to have more than 1 variation in your reppertoire!
Then it's time to look for something else. Thanks for the advice. I think i will try the hyper accelerated dragon. I would try the Taimanov but i won't be able to find any lines for it where else i have an entire book on the dragon including lines against the Maroczy Bind. Simple development, nothing fancy. Bg2 Nc6 8. O-O O-O-O This is an easy opening to play, without much if any theory, as black's plan is very easy: Bg4 , Nc6 , O-O-O and go crazy against almost any development scheme that white adopts.
Nf3 e6 3. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Not many people know the correct continuation for white, and this plays in your favor. However, against correct play this line is probably just losing. Bd2 Nxc3 8. If white accepts, black has unquestionable influence over the dark squares, but he is still not in extremely good shape.
Bh6 g6 The discovery of this move has "doomed" the whole pinning the Nc3. Qg3 d6 Nb5 Nc6 It is always fun playing for mating attacks and on these lines you'll certainly have many chances to do so. If you are a gambler and like risks and do not mind playing almost-surely- flawed lines, try the Pin variation. You will get a taste of what playing the Sicilian is, and maybe upgrade your repertoire to the Taimanov or other in the future. Pablo S. Ocal Pablo S.
Ocal 2, 12 12 silver badges 33 33 bronze badges. I don't think your pin variation line is remotely appropriate for players who still at the level of asking for aggressive responses to 1. For players at that level, just going up the exchange with Bxf8 and then developing normally is likely to be a winning plan for White. I agree, and that's why I didn't recommended it. However, with players of that level as you said , the chance that he encounters an opponent that actually knows the theory for this line is extremely slim.
This is why I said that if he wanted to gamble his way onto the game, he might as well try it. Ocal Sep 24 '14 at CognisMantis CognisMantis 2, 10 10 silver badges 25 25 bronze badges. Evan Harper Evan Harper 2 2 silver badges 9 9 bronze badges. Whole problem in this case is that Okay, here we go: 2.
So let's try another way: 1. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Nf6 black wants complications after 4. Ng5 but heeey, I can play 4. If white is Ruy Lopez player and black wants to complicate with Janisch Gambit 3. It's white who deals cards. But still 1.
- irregular openings chess is fun book 13 Manual.
- Au temps des catastrophes (La Découverte/Poche) (French Edition).
- Bridge of Sighs.
- Unmade Classics: Two Hilarious Situation Comedies.
- Top 75 Chess Blogs.
- Manufacturer of the World's Finest Chess Products.
- Afghanistan by Donkey: A Year in a War Zone;
I don't know why you think this is an objection to my answer. I said that at his level of play the open game will more often than not lead to aggressive tactics. I even acknowledged that in my answer. ETD John Moyer John Moyer 13 3 3 bronze badges. This is good advice but it doesn't seem to answer the question. Wargzel Wargzel 13 3 3 bronze badges.
Nc3 d6 3. Nf3 fxe4 5. Nxe4 Bf5 6. Bd3 Nh6 7. Bb5 a6 Rh4 e5 Nfg5 Bxd1 Kxd1 exd4 Ne6 Qxh4 Nxa8 Qxe4 Nb6 Ng4 Kd2 Rh2 Similarly, h4 might anticipate Black castling kingside with a fianchetto, in which case all Black has to do is castle queenside to make that move a waste. But that approach does mean you should memorize a response for all possible first moves If you play a6 to a3, then you may as well play a3 to begin with.
That would be consistent. The irregular player may have some theory or tricks based on surprise or something. That is why every player must prepare for or be confident for meeting an irregular opening.
There are two types of irregular opening players: ones who come with a bagful of tricks and ideas, and joke players. There's nothing illegitimate or invalid about the former. It's not objectionable to play a rare trappy opening to catch the opponent out, they do it at super gm level all the time I know this is 5 months old, but considering the rating I think it's good to mention some basic advice. Grab some center, develop your pieces, and castle to where it's safe.
Avoid starting a fight before your development is finished i. A common mistake is to try to immediately punish a "bad" opening. Sometimes the most effective punishment is simply developing all your pieces. At the end of 10 moves you'll notice their opening is obscure for a reason. They've likely given up space, tempo, king safety or other things.
The reward for playing well against an odd opening is rarely a win in 10 moves. Most usually it's a very good middlegame. Here's another way to create two categories of unorthodox opening moves: 1 Good, waiting move that doesn't weaken anything. Examples: 1. Nh3, 1. Na3, 1. As such, it is difficult to comment on the opening , except by exam- ining the limitations on those transpositions.
Black can, of course, oc- cupy the center with pawns, and take over those privileges usually asso- ciated with the White side. The move a3 may be simply irrelevant, but then again it may not. White weakens the kingside, and after 2. Nevertheless, it enjoys a devoted following of fans, or perhaps fanatics, who use it persistently.
The opening can be played in two ways. If White follows up with h3, we have the Macho Grob. When the g-pawn advances to g5, we have the Spike, though that is extremely rare these days. Other ap- proaches for White involve a gambit of the g-pawn, or various schemes of development explored by Claude Bloodgood, who wrote a book titled The Tactical Grob. After 3. Qb3 Nc6 gives Black some counterplay.
A place to enjoy and learn about chess
Schiller, Eric. Unorthodox Chess Openings. Sqod, why the hell are you pasting all of that? That has nothing to do with what I was saying. You just decided that since we were talking about irregular openings you'd just post that you found about irregular openings online? I like my categorization is better - 1 Irregular openings with ideas and theoretical advantages or tricks behind them for example the Grob and 2 Irregular openings with nothing behind them, no point.
I'm pretty sure 1. Just because something is partly weakening doesn't make them "bad", every active move near the start is partly weakening something. There is no similar value in your categorization so shut up and stop bolding words nonsensically. I wasn't responding to you; I was responding to the original poster, who asked how to respond to irregular openings. Since it seems the rest of my logic was lost on you, I'm not going to go over it.
Like to make enemies much? I thank you all for your suggestions, and I have learned much more about chess in my five month absence from this thread I assumed it was dead.
Openings, High Level and Club | The Week in Chess
I am much more proficient now at understanding openings rather than memorising moves. My problem now is understanding the offbeat gambits of which the original replier spoke. I have not developed a sense that can tell me when things are becoming dangerous and I need accurate play. Does anyone have any suggestions for honing such skills? My personal style of play tactics, traps, aggressive open play preffered : , means I am more than happy to sacrifice a pawn or two for a lead in tempo, development or control of the board.
Doesn't matter what point in the game it is. As for memorising moves, I can't remember the last time I met someone that was able to memorise several billion combinations of something. It's all well and good memorising your 10 times tables but if you know HOW to multiply, then by Joe, the worlds your oyster! Fiveofswords put it best in his first comment. Before I end up rambling too much, I'll leave you with some typical opening gambits I pretty much play all the time. Stuff the pawn, if whitey wants to help me get ahead of him in the arms race for a minor financial contribution Fun to play though, especially at my level!
Thank you for your suggestion, and I am well-familiarised with said gambits though the scandinavian and old benoni are not gambits , for they are common. As for me being a higher rated player, I mostly waste my time playing blitz. Although my online chess rating probably more accurately represents what my FIDE or USCF rating would be, I mostly use it to mess around with friends who are rated significantly lower than I am. With respect to blitz chess, in which you are rated roughly points higher than I am, your opinion is appreciated.
I also think the some irregular openings are very good.